Compare Intex Indie 15 with Nokia 2680 slide

Intex Indie 15 vs Nokia 2680 slide Comparison on Pricekart.com. Lowest price of Intex Indie 15 is 8999 and Nokia 2680 slide lowest price is 8999 . Compare Intex Indie 15 with Nokia 2680 slide specifications, features, score, prices and Pros & cons as well for better decision making.

Compare Intex Indie 15 vs Nokia 2680 slide

Summary	70 Score	66 Score
Performance	MTK6737 2 GB RAM Android v7.0 (Nougat)	TI OMAP 3430 Feature phone
Display	5.2 inch 720 x 1280 pixels 194 PPI Density	1.8 inch 128 x 160 pixels 114 PPI Density
Camera	13 MP (Main) 5 MP (Front)	0.64 MP (Main)
Battery	2800 mAh Li-ion	860 mAh Li-Ion
Display
Screen Size	5.2 inch	1.8 inch
Screen Resolution	720 x 1280 pixels	128x160 pixels
Pixel Density	194 PPI	114 PPI
Display Type	IPS LCD	TFT, 65K colors
Gorilla Glass	-	-
Screen Protection	-	-
Chipset
Brand	Intex Mobiles	Nokia Mobiles
Chipset	MTK6737	TI OMAP 3430
Processor	1.3 GHz, Quad Core Processor
RAM	2 GB RAM
GPU		PowerVR SGX530
Camera
Rear Camera Resolution	13 MP	0.64 MP
Front Camera Resolution	5 MP
Video
Camera Features	Autofocus, Flash, Panorama
General
Operating System	Android	Other
OS Version	Android v7.0 (Nougat)	Feature phone
Weight		97 g
Dimensions		99 x 47 x 15 mm, 61.7 cc
Thickness
Storage
Internal Storage	16 GB	0 GB
Card Slot	microSD, Up to 128 GB	No
Other	16 GB ,Expandable Upto 128 GB	4GB RAM
Communication
SIM Card Slots	Dual SIM	Single SIM
SIM Card Type	Micro-SIM	Normal-SIM
Bluetooth	v4.1	v2.0, A2DP, EDR
3.5 mm Jack	Yes	Yes
NFC		No
Connectivity
VoLTE
4G	FDD-LTE--800 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 MHz
3G	UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz
2G	GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz	GSM 900 / 1800
Wi-Fi	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n	No
GPS	A-GPS	No
GPRS
EDGE
Radio
Battery
Battery Capacity	2800 mAh	860 mAh
Battery Type	Li-ion	Li-Ion
Standby Time		Up to 420 h
Talk Time		Up to 3 h 30 min
Other Features
Fingerprint Scanner
Waterproof
Sensors
Messaging		SMS, MMS, Email
Java		Yes, MIDP 2.1
Other		MP3 player , Nokia Xpress Audio Messaging , Advanced calculator , Organizer , DARP (for improved network usage efficiency)